Reasonable doubt stems from insufficient evidence. This standard of proof is much higher than the civil standard, called “ preponderance of the evidence,” which only requires a certainty greater than 50 percent.įor an article detailing the origins of this standard, download this University of Chicago Law Review article.įor Supreme Court cases related to this legal standard, see Patterson v. law, a defendant is considered innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the jury must be virtually certain of the defendant’s guilt in order to render a guilty verdict. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial. In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. If you know or believe something beyond a shadow of a doubt, you are certain that it is true: He is responsible beyond a shadow of a doubt. And I believe that now without a shadow of doubt. Besides, Pierre Roger was a great pope, without a shadow of doubt the best I have served. Beyond a reasonable doubt is the legal burden of proof required to affirm a conviction in a criminal case. Without a shadow of doubt, their presence has had a real impact on the human rights situation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |